PRO-ACTIVENESS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ON THE 24-HOUR PRE-TRIAL DETENTION IN ZAMBIA: A HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE

Main Article Content

Emmanuel Mukelabai Yula
Oliver Magasu

Abstract

This study assessed the pro-activeness of the Human Rights Commission on 24-hour pre-trial detention. The following objectives guided the study;   to establish the pro-activeness of the Human Rights Commission on the 24-hour pre-trial detention in Lusaka District, to identify the challenges faced by the Human Rights Commission on the 24-hour pre-trial detention in Lusaka District and to establish strategies put in place by Human Rights Commission in safeguarding the 24 hour pre-trial detention in Lusaka District. The study adopted a qualitative approach and used a hermeneutics phenomenology research design. Data were generated through an interview guide. Findings: It was clear that the Human Rights Commission is responsible for educating and investigating human rights violations, investigating any maladministration of justice, and proposing possible measures to prevent human rights abuse. The findings also revealed that participants had a shallow understanding of the Criminal Procedure Code Act about the 24 24-hour pre-trial Detention. It was further established that the Human Rights Commission was reactive when it comes to the 24-hour pre-trial detention because of among other reasons, delay in the prosecution of criminal cases necessitated by poor investigations (unsubstantiated evidence), and administrative hiccups embedded in the investigative system. The study recommends the decentralisation of the Human Rights Commission office to the police station level, boosting the labour force at the Human Rights Commission and reintroduction and re-launching a continuous human rights-based education to all the investigative wings in the quest to appreciate Criminal justice-timely.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yula , E. M. ., & Magasu , O. . (2024). PRO-ACTIVENESS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ON THE 24-HOUR PRE-TRIAL DETENTION IN ZAMBIA: A HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE . Kwame Nkrumah University Multi-Disciplinary Journal - Zambia, 1(2), 134–147. Retrieved from https://accessjournal.nkrumah.edu.zm/index.php/knuj/article/view/57
Section
Social Sciences

References

Africa News (2015). Botswana hangs man convicted of murder and robbery in 2015. www.africanews.com [Visited on 26th October, 2022].

Amnesty International (1999). Applying the Law Fairly or Fatally? Police Violation of Human Rights in Zambia. www.refworld.org [Visited on 10th September, 2023]

BBC NEWS (2017). Zambia opposition leader Hakainde released. www.bbc.com [Visted on 25th August, 2022].

Boaz, D. (1997). Libertarianism. www.book.google.co.zm. [Visited on 18th March, 2024]

Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. 3rd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press

Crime Investigation (2022). Steven Wright-The Suffolk Strangler. www.Crimeinvestigation.co.uk [Visited on 1st October, 2022].

Freedman, R. (2015). Failing to protect: The UN and the Politicization of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.

Garcio, J.P. (2009). Education Policy Making in Kenya: The Case of Paradigm Change in a Developing Nation.

Grote, R. (2023). Protection of individuals in the Pre-trial Procedure.hrlibrary.umn.edu [Visited on 7th July, 2023].

Gukiina, P. (2018). A critical analysis of pre-trial detention in Uganda. www.ir.kiu.ac.ug [Visited on 10th October, 2022]

Inutu, A. (2017). A Critique of the Efficacy of the Communications Procedure of the African Commission of Human and Peoples’ Rights. www.prisonstudies.org. [Visited on 18th March 2024]

Kankondo, S.J. (2010). Media and the judicial process: contending with trial by media. www.unza.zm [Visted on 9th October, 2022].

Klein, D.J. (1997. The pre-trial detention Crisis: the causes and the cure. Urban Law Annual Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, Volume 52 Tribute to judge Theodore Mcmillian.

Kuh, R. H. (1978).Trial Technique-How to Avoid Improper Pre-trial and Trial Publicly. Criminal Law Bulletin Volume: 14, Issue3. Available at www.ojp.gov [visited on 8th July, 2023]

Lind, A. (2021). The Power of the Human Rights Council: A comparative study of Afghanistan and Russia. www.divaportal.org.net [Visited on 22nd May, 2023].

Lusaka Times (2017). The Trial of Obvious Mwaliteta has Kicked Off. www. Lusakatimes.com

Lusaka Times (2022). Mumbi Phiri formally arrested and charged with Murder. www.lusakatimes.com [Visited on 30th December, 2022]

Lusaka Times (2023). Former PF Deputy Secretary Mumbi Phiri freed as State enter Nolle Prosequi. www.lusakatimes.com [Visited on 24th April, 2023].

Martufi, A. & Peristeridou, C. (2020). The purpose of pre-trial detention and the quest for alternatives. European Journal of crime, criminal law and Justice. www.brill.com [Visited on 6th October, 2022].

McGreal, C. (2015). 70 Years and half a Trillion Dollars Later: What has the UN Achieved? www.guardian.com [Visited on 4th September, 2023]

Ndulo, M. (2017). DPP Undermining Judicial System. www.diggers.news [Visited on 08th September, 2023]

Ndulo, M. (2018).Excessive bail conditions make a mockery of presumption of innocence. www.diggers.news [Visited on 8th October, 2022].

Ngulube (2011). Pre-Trial Detention in Zambia. www.prisonstudies.org. [Visited on 18th March, 2024]

Opportunity Agenda (2023). Promote justice in Pre-trial Services & Practices. www.rmingthesystem.org [Visited on 7th July, 2023].

OSISA (2011). Pre-trial Detention in Malawi: Understanding Caseflow Management and Conditions of Incarceration. OSISA

Pirzado, A.P. (2022). Teacher’s Understanding and Practices in Teaching Human Rights Concepts in Pakistani Schools. www.researchgate.net [Visited on 3rd September, 2023]

Shubayi, C. (2007). Fair trial and the presumption of innocence in Zambia. www.unza.zm [Visted on 8th October, 2022].

Smith,T. ( 2022). The practice of pre-trial detention in England & Wales-Changing law and changing culture. Www.Link.springnger.com [Visited on 3rd October, 2022].

Stevenson, M. T (2018). Distortion of Justice: How Inability to Pay Bail Assets Case Outc omes. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organisations

United Nations (2022). Human rights Council. www.ohchr.org.com [Visited on 24th August, 2022].

Yang, S.C. (2021). The USA Pre-trail system: Balancing individual rights and public interests, Journal of economic perspectives Vol.35, No.4 pp49-70.

Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (2022). Preliminary Findings from its visit to Botswana (4th to 15th July, 2022).

Zambia Law Development Commission (2023). Zambia Updates the Human Rights Council on The Universal Review 2023. www. Zambianlawdevelopmentcommission Zambia LII. (1980). Mainza and others V People (HP 1173). Www.ZambiaLii.org. [Visited on 23rd September, 2022].